VP’s wife tasks women, Islamic organisations on insecurity
Blood flows in Kwara community as bandits raid banks, kill officials
JAMB releases 68,000 withheld results
Emergency rule, not a solution to insecurity -Archbishop Fearon
Anti-terror war gulped N372bn in 2012 -Report
FCT minister swears-in newly elected area council chairmen Monday
No curfew in Daura- KTSG
Ex militants now rely on NDDC for rehabilitation
Group condemns ban on use of Hijab in Lagos schoolds
NAFDAC to prosecute owners of fake drugs’ warehouses
2015: Youth leader raps Delta politicians
Plateau people hold congress
Akanu Ibiam Airport to handle 500,000 passengers yearly - Says Jonathan
Nwuche commends President Jonathan over emergency declaration …says it is a stitch in time
Minister woos investors to transport sector
State of the nation: Catholic Bishops want political solution
Reps probe banks over N100 bn tax remittance
WILAT commended for supporting transport sector
NMA Bauchi sets up committee on fake doctors
Emergency: ‘Why Adamawa should be reconsidered’
Gov Aliyu distances self from presidential poster
Thousands bid farewell to ANPP at last convention in Zamfara
1,627 killed in attacks since January -Investigation
Drawing the curtain on CPC, ANPP
APC’ll wage war against corruption-Fashakin
Opposition will soon rule -Rep Betara
Emergency: Jonathan cannot remove governors - Lawyers … No decision on it yet - Presidency
Alakyo: IGP says some police still being held in bush
PDP can’t intimidate us - Gaidam, Fayemi
NCPC holds first stakeholders’ summit
Jonathan still stands disqualified - Yahaya Mahmood
- Details
- Category: News
- Written by Adelanwa Bamgboye & Ismail Mudashir, Kaduna
- Hits: 772
The decision of the FCT High Court on Friday that cleared the way for President Goodluck Jonathan to contest the 2015 general elections has continued to elicit reactions from lawyers.
The court ruled in a suit by Mr Cyriacus Njoku filed in March 2012.
Njoku had prayed for the court to declare President Jonathan ineligible to contest in 2015 on the basis that he could not take the oath of office of the president three times under the Nigeria Constitution.
But the presiding judge, Justice Mudashiru Oniyangi held that Jonathan had not yet served two terms as substantive president hence he was eligible to contest in 2015.
But reacting to the judgment yesterday in Kaduna, Yahaya Mahmood, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), insisted that President Jonathan still stands disqualified.
“I believed that the person who went to Court has no right to be heard. Besides, it is speculative. PDP has not issued guidelines for election; President Jonathan has not declared his interest and the Constitution may be amended. Be that as it may, with respects, on the Law and Case Law as it is, he is disqualified.
“Firstly, by Section 137(2) he has been elected to such Office on previous occasions. In 2007 because they were elected together with Late President Yar’adua, and he eventually took oath as President, without going through election, and in 2011 he had his second election. Secondly the Supreme Court has said in Tenure Elongation Suit that the Constitution envisage two terms of 8 years only, not a day more. If he wins and leave in 2019, that’s more than 8 years. Let’s wait for his declaration 2014, and if the Constitution will be amended”, Mahmood said.
However, another senior advocate, Sam Ologunorisa, while also reacting to the court ruling said that “the judgment was well considered. The reasoning is logical and consistent with the law”.
Jonathan still stands disqualified - Yahaya Mahmood
Category: News Written by Adelanwa Bamgboye & Ismail Mudashir, Kaduna Hits: 772
The decision of the FCT High Court on Friday that cleared the way for President Goodluck Jonathan to contest the 2015 general elections has continued to elicit reactions from lawyers.
The court ruled in a suit by Mr Cyriacus Njoku filed in March 2012.
Njoku had prayed for the court to declare President Jonathan ineligible to contest in 2015 on the basis that he could not take the oath of office of the president three times under the Nigeria Constitution.
But the presiding judge, Justice Mudashiru Oniyangi held that Jonathan had not yet served two terms as substantive president hence he was eligible to contest in 2015.
But reacting to the judgment yesterday in Kaduna, Yahaya Mahmood, Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), insisted that President Jonathan still stands disqualified.
“I believed that the person who went to Court has no right to be heard. Besides, it is speculative. PDP has not issued guidelines for election; President Jonathan has not declared his interest and the Constitution may be amended. Be that as it may, with respects, on the Law and Case Law as it is, he is disqualified.
“Firstly, by Section 137(2) he has been elected to such Office on previous occasions. In 2007 because they were elected together with Late President Yar’adua, and he eventually took oath as President, without going through election, and in 2011 he had his second election. Secondly the Supreme Court has said in Tenure Elongation Suit that the Constitution envisage two terms of 8 years only, not a day more. If he wins and leave in 2019, that’s more than 8 years. Let’s wait for his declaration 2014, and if the Constitution will be amended”, Mahmood said.
However, another senior advocate, Sam Ologunorisa, while also reacting to the court ruling said that “the judgment was well considered. The reasoning is logical and consistent with the law”.


